<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 159 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245661</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition on account of provisions for loss on mark to market on derivatives. The decision was based on judicial precedence, specifically citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CIT v/s Woodward Governor (India) P. Ltd. and the Tribunal&#039;s previous ruling in a similar case. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established legal principles in resolving disputes related to such provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 10:40:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 159 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245661</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the deletion of the addition on account of provisions for loss on mark to market on derivatives. The decision was based on judicial precedence, specifically citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in CIT v/s Woodward Governor (India) P. Ltd. and the Tribunal&#039;s previous ruling in a similar case. The Tribunal affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established legal principles in resolving disputes related to such provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>