<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 845 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163523</link>
    <description>Penalty is leviable in proceedings under section 30B(4) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act because that sub-section adopts the assessment and recovery mechanism in section 30B(3), and section 30B(3) expressly authorises penalty in addition to tax. Where the declared purchaser is bogus, non-existent, untraceable, or denies the purchase, the statutory presumption of local sale applies unless the consignor or connected person proves the truth of the declaration. On that construction, the penalty consequence carried by section 30B(3) extends to proceedings under section 30B(4), and the revisional authority was justified in restoring the penalty order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 845 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163523</link>
      <description>Penalty is leviable in proceedings under section 30B(4) of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act because that sub-section adopts the assessment and recovery mechanism in section 30B(3), and section 30B(3) expressly authorises penalty in addition to tax. Where the declared purchaser is bogus, non-existent, untraceable, or denies the purchase, the statutory presumption of local sale applies unless the consignor or connected person proves the truth of the declaration. On that construction, the penalty consequence carried by section 30B(3) extends to proceedings under section 30B(4), and the revisional authority was justified in restoring the penalty order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>