<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 474 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163508</link>
    <description>The court addressed discrepancies in inspection findings and unaccounted transactions at the assessee&#039;s business premises. The assessing authority proposed additions to the turnover, which were partially reduced by appellate authorities and the Tribunal. The court emphasized the need for justifying additions based on concrete evidence and not speculative assumptions. It directed the assessing authority to add only the actual sale value of purchases covered by check-post declarations and a specific amount related to suppressed transactions. The revision petition was allowed to modify the assessment for the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:35:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 474 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163508</link>
      <description>The court addressed discrepancies in inspection findings and unaccounted transactions at the assessee&#039;s business premises. The assessing authority proposed additions to the turnover, which were partially reduced by appellate authorities and the Tribunal. The court emphasized the need for justifying additions based on concrete evidence and not speculative assumptions. It directed the assessing authority to add only the actual sale value of purchases covered by check-post declarations and a specific amount related to suppressed transactions. The revision petition was allowed to modify the assessment for the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163508</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>