<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163503</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 21 could not justify further turnover enhancement where the same material had already been considered in the original assessments. The article notes that the dealer&#039;s business conditions, including the riot-related destruction of the shop and absence of proper account books, were already factored into the original estimates; the timber import information in form XXXI did not warrant additional additions for 1984-85 or 1985-86, so those reassessment additions were set aside. For 1986-87, the turnover fixed on the record was independently supportable and showed no demonstrable error, so it was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:47:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 680 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163503</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 21 could not justify further turnover enhancement where the same material had already been considered in the original assessments. The article notes that the dealer&#039;s business conditions, including the riot-related destruction of the shop and absence of proper account books, were already factored into the original estimates; the timber import information in form XXXI did not warrant additional additions for 1984-85 or 1985-86, so those reassessment additions were set aside. For 1986-87, the turnover fixed on the record was independently supportable and showed no demonstrable error, so it was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>