<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 525 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163488</link>
    <description>Suo motu revision under the Assam General Sales Tax Act requires a reasoned finding, following proper enquiry, that the underlying assessment is erroneous and prejudicial to the State&#039;s interests. Mere suspicion does not justify revisional intervention or consequential reassessment. Examination of the dealer&#039;s records, including a corrected broker&#039;s certificate, and factual determination of ownership, the purchase chain and alleged tax evasion are necessary where those matters are disputed. Revision and reassessment cannot be sustained where the authority neither conducts adequate enquiry nor identifies a jurisdictional defect in the original assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 525 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163488</link>
      <description>Suo motu revision under the Assam General Sales Tax Act requires a reasoned finding, following proper enquiry, that the underlying assessment is erroneous and prejudicial to the State&#039;s interests. Mere suspicion does not justify revisional intervention or consequential reassessment. Examination of the dealer&#039;s records, including a corrected broker&#039;s certificate, and factual determination of ownership, the purchase chain and alleged tax evasion are necessary where those matters are disputed. Revision and reassessment cannot be sustained where the authority neither conducts adequate enquiry nor identifies a jurisdictional defect in the original assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>