<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 564 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163487</link>
    <description>Where a notification uses the word &quot;yarn&quot; without definition, it must be construed in its ordinary commercial and grammatical sense. On that basis, yarn is a spun strand primarily meant for weaving, knitting or rope-making. Applying that test, badh (baan), a finished product made from grass and used mainly for cots, did not satisfy the essential characteristics of yarn, even if it could be used in making cots and other articles. The later exemption notification for badh (baan) also supported the view that it was outside the yarn entry. It was therefore treated as an unclassified item rather than goods falling within the concessional yarn entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 564 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163487</link>
      <description>Where a notification uses the word &quot;yarn&quot; without definition, it must be construed in its ordinary commercial and grammatical sense. On that basis, yarn is a spun strand primarily meant for weaving, knitting or rope-making. Applying that test, badh (baan), a finished product made from grass and used mainly for cots, did not satisfy the essential characteristics of yarn, even if it could be used in making cots and other articles. The later exemption notification for badh (baan) also supported the view that it was outside the yarn entry. It was therefore treated as an unclassified item rather than goods falling within the concessional yarn entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>