<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (11) TMI 556 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163484</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized the improper disposal of stay petitions through printed pro formas, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders. The Court highlighted the revisional authority&#039;s misdirection in dismissing the stay petition due to an incorrect understanding of the assessment order. Both appellate and revisional authorities failed to consider essential facts, leading to the Court setting aside their orders. The Court directed the appellate authority to reconsider the stay petition promptly, considering the Court&#039;s observations. The writ petition was allowed, overturning previous decisions, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (11) TMI 556 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163484</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized the improper disposal of stay petitions through printed pro formas, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders. The Court highlighted the revisional authority&#039;s misdirection in dismissing the stay petition due to an incorrect understanding of the assessment order. Both appellate and revisional authorities failed to consider essential facts, leading to the Court setting aside their orders. The Court directed the appellate authority to reconsider the stay petition promptly, considering the Court&#039;s observations. The writ petition was allowed, overturning previous decisions, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>