<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 568 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163483</link>
    <description>Coal cinder is not treated as coal for sales tax classification under the U.P. Sales Tax Act notifications because commercial parlance recognises cinder as a burn-out residue and a distinct commodity, not a mineral product. The phrase &quot;coal including coke in all its forms, but excluding charcoal&quot; was read as covering coke in its forms, not enlarging coal to include cinder. Earlier authorities supporting the dealer were distinguished or treated as per incuriam for not noticing binding precedent, and departmental views taken in separate proceedings were held not binding on the Tribunal or the Court. The result was that cinder could not be taxed at the coal rate under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:01:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 568 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163483</link>
      <description>Coal cinder is not treated as coal for sales tax classification under the U.P. Sales Tax Act notifications because commercial parlance recognises cinder as a burn-out residue and a distinct commodity, not a mineral product. The phrase &quot;coal including coke in all its forms, but excluding charcoal&quot; was read as covering coke in its forms, not enlarging coal to include cinder. Earlier authorities supporting the dealer were distinguished or treated as per incuriam for not noticing binding precedent, and departmental views taken in separate proceedings were held not binding on the Tribunal or the Court. The result was that cinder could not be taxed at the coal rate under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>