https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245633 The High Court balanced the interests of both parties by directing the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 3 lacs, on top of the initial deposit, to hear the appeal concerning the quantum of pre-deposit under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court did not address the consideration of Sales Tax Returns in the final decision, emphasizing the procedural requirement of the additional deposit for the appeal to proceed. Additionally, the Court granted an extension until 30.4.2014 for the appellant to make the pre-deposit, ensuring fairness and justice in the appeal process. en-us Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Mar 2014 12:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245633 The High Court balanced the interests of both parties by directing the appellant to deposit an additional Rs. 3 lacs, on top of the initial deposit, to hear the appeal concerning the quantum of pre-deposit under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court did not address the consideration of Sales Tax Returns in the final decision, emphasizing the procedural requirement of the additional deposit for the appeal to proceed. Additionally, the Court granted an extension until 30.4.2014 for the appellant to make the pre-deposit, ensuring fairness and justice in the appeal process. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245633