<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 668 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163442</link>
    <description>Commercial tax proceedings should not be decided on an unduly technical approach where a valuable right of hearing is affected. The court found that dismissal of the revision for default, followed by rejection of the restoration request by a non-speaking order, was unsustainable because the authority and the single Judge applied strict procedural rules too rigidly. A lenient approach was required once the dismissal came to light, particularly in proceedings before commercial tax authorities. The revision was therefore restored for hearing and disposal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:16:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 668 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163442</link>
      <description>Commercial tax proceedings should not be decided on an unduly technical approach where a valuable right of hearing is affected. The court found that dismissal of the revision for default, followed by rejection of the restoration request by a non-speaking order, was unsustainable because the authority and the single Judge applied strict procedural rules too rigidly. A lenient approach was required once the dismissal came to light, particularly in proceedings before commercial tax authorities. The revision was therefore restored for hearing and disposal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>