<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 123 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245625</link>
    <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment as it lacked validity under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner had disclosed all material facts, and the retrospective amendment of Section 80IA did not warrant reopening beyond the specified period. The court held that the conditions for invoking powers under Section 147 were not met, and the notice was without legal authority. The petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 123 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245625</link>
      <description>The court quashed the notice for reopening the assessment as it lacked validity under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The petitioner had disclosed all material facts, and the retrospective amendment of Section 80IA did not warrant reopening beyond the specified period. The court held that the conditions for invoking powers under Section 147 were not met, and the notice was without legal authority. The petition was disposed of in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>