https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245621 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's request for interim relief, stating that the recovery process during the appeal's pendency was not illegal. The Court directed the petitioner to seek relief directly from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and emphasized that it could not issue mandatory orders at that stage. However, due to the significant tax amount involved, the Court instructed the Tribunal to expedite the appeal hearing for the assessment year 2010-2011, considering the lack of regular sittings at Jabalpur. The petitioner was directed to file an application for an expedited hearing within two weeks, with the Tribunal required to schedule a hearing within four weeks and decide promptly. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245621 The High Court dismissed the petitioner's request for interim relief, stating that the recovery process during the appeal's pendency was not illegal. The Court directed the petitioner to seek relief directly from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and emphasized that it could not issue mandatory orders at that stage. However, due to the significant tax amount involved, the Court instructed the Tribunal to expedite the appeal hearing for the assessment year 2010-2011, considering the lack of regular sittings at Jabalpur. The petitioner was directed to file an application for an expedited hearing within two weeks, with the Tribunal required to schedule a hearing within four weeks and decide promptly. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245621