<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 96 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245598</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside all duty demands, confiscations, and penalties, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to substantiate allegations of clandestine removal and the requirement for the Revenue to discharge the burden of proof.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 96 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245598</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside all duty demands, confiscations, and penalties, allowing the appeals with consequential relief to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the need for corroborative evidence to substantiate allegations of clandestine removal and the requirement for the Revenue to discharge the burden of proof.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>