<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 85 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245587</link>
    <description>Interim pre-deposit in a central excise dispute turned on the strength of the Department&#039;s evidence and the appellant&#039;s prima facie case. For one demand component based on weighment slips from a third-party dharamkanta and a statement later unavailable for cross-examination, the material was treated as weak, and no pre-deposit was required at that stage. For the second component, weighment slips recovered from the factory were corroborated by production register entries and truck numbers, so a partial pre-deposit was directed. The commentary also notes that financial hardship was considered in fixing the deposit, and waiver and stay were granted for the balance during pendency of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 05:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 85 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245587</link>
      <description>Interim pre-deposit in a central excise dispute turned on the strength of the Department&#039;s evidence and the appellant&#039;s prima facie case. For one demand component based on weighment slips from a third-party dharamkanta and a statement later unavailable for cross-examination, the material was treated as weak, and no pre-deposit was required at that stage. For the second component, weighment slips recovered from the factory were corroborated by production register entries and truck numbers, so a partial pre-deposit was directed. The commentary also notes that financial hardship was considered in fixing the deposit, and waiver and stay were granted for the balance during pendency of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>