<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 84 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the delay in disposing of the stay petition was not the appellant&#039;s fault and granted an interim stay against the recovery of dues. The appellant had already deposited Rs.3.06 crores in good faith. The next hearing for the stay petition was scheduled for 3.4.2013, with orders to be provided dasti to both parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2014 05:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 84 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the delay in disposing of the stay petition was not the appellant&#039;s fault and granted an interim stay against the recovery of dues. The appellant had already deposited Rs.3.06 crores in good faith. The next hearing for the stay petition was scheduled for 3.4.2013, with orders to be provided dasti to both parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>