<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 73 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245575</link>
    <description>The delay in filing cross-objections by the assessee was condoned by the ITAT Hyderabad. The Assessing Officer&#039;s income estimation was adjusted by the CIT(A), allowing deduction for diesel expenses and calculating income at 7% of net contract receipts. The deduction for interest and remuneration payments to partners was allowed, following a previous decision in favor of the assessee. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment due to the ex-parte framing of the assessment. Ultimately, both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 73 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245575</link>
      <description>The delay in filing cross-objections by the assessee was condoned by the ITAT Hyderabad. The Assessing Officer&#039;s income estimation was adjusted by the CIT(A), allowing deduction for diesel expenses and calculating income at 7% of net contract receipts. The deduction for interest and remuneration payments to partners was allowed, following a previous decision in favor of the assessee. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh assessment due to the ex-parte framing of the assessment. Ultimately, both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection were treated as allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>