<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163441</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the partnership firm engaged in the business of builders and developers was partly allowed. The additions made by the Assessing Officer based on uncorroborated statements were partly confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to the extent of sales of certain flats during the relevant period. The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of additions based on impounded documents but dismissed the ad-hoc addition made by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:14:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 713 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163441</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the partnership firm engaged in the business of builders and developers was partly allowed. The additions made by the Assessing Officer based on uncorroborated statements were partly confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to the extent of sales of certain flats during the relevant period. The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of additions based on impounded documents but dismissed the ad-hoc addition made by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>