<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 560 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding stock transfer and job-work claims for assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83 were set aside. The Tribunal failed to properly consider the burden of proof on the dealer for stock transfer and overlooked key aspects in the job-work claim. Both issues were remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with the relevant legal provisions. The department&#039;s burden of proof was emphasized, and a detailed examination of case facts and contract terms was required for a new decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:49:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 560 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions regarding stock transfer and job-work claims for assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83 were set aside. The Tribunal failed to properly consider the burden of proof on the dealer for stock transfer and overlooked key aspects in the job-work claim. Both issues were remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with the relevant legal provisions. The department&#039;s burden of proof was emphasized, and a detailed examination of case facts and contract terms was required for a new decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>