https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163433 Where a taxing statute provides an appellate remedy subject to a mandatory pre-deposit, writ relief under article 226 will ordinarily not be entertained. The text explains that the petitioners had already invoked the statutory appeals, but those appeals were not admitted because the required deposit of 12.5 per cent of the disputed tax was not made. As no exceptional ground such as lack of jurisdiction, invalid law, or breach of fundamental rights was shown, the High Court treated the statutory scheme as the proper route and refused to permit bypass of the appeal process. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:28:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163433 Where a taxing statute provides an appellate remedy subject to a mandatory pre-deposit, writ relief under article 226 will ordinarily not be entertained. The text explains that the petitioners had already invoked the statutory appeals, but those appeals were not admitted because the required deposit of 12.5 per cent of the disputed tax was not made. As no exceptional ground such as lack of jurisdiction, invalid law, or breach of fundamental rights was shown, the High Court treated the statutory scheme as the proper route and refused to permit bypass of the appeal process. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163433