<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 632 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163430</link>
    <description>A taxing notification covering &quot;iron made kitchen utensils and appliances&quot; did not extend to tin trays, because the language specifically referred to goods made of iron and separately distinguished containers made of tin, iron, or steel. On a plain and natural construction, articles made of a different material could not be included by implication where the entry was narrower. The earlier precedent relied on by the Tribunal concerned broader wording and did not decide the present issue. Tin trays were therefore treated as an unclassified item liable to the higher rate, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 632 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163430</link>
      <description>A taxing notification covering &quot;iron made kitchen utensils and appliances&quot; did not extend to tin trays, because the language specifically referred to goods made of iron and separately distinguished containers made of tin, iron, or steel. On a plain and natural construction, articles made of a different material could not be included by implication where the entry was narrower. The earlier precedent relied on by the Tribunal concerned broader wording and did not decide the present issue. Tin trays were therefore treated as an unclassified item liable to the higher rate, and the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>