<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 631 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163428</link>
    <description>The revision against the Tribunal&#039;s order related to the assessment year 1981-82, concerning the rejection of claims of a dealer regarding stock transfer, was dismissed. The turnover claimed as stock transfer to the Delhi Head Office was treated as Central Sales by the assessing authority, a decision upheld by the appellate authority and the Tribunal. The Tribunal&#039;s finding rejecting the stock transfer claim was considered a factual determination based on evidence from a survey conducted at the dealer&#039;s premises, supporting the assessment of Central Sales. The dealer&#039;s reliance on a previous judgment for a different assessment year was deemed insufficient to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:09:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 631 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163428</link>
      <description>The revision against the Tribunal&#039;s order related to the assessment year 1981-82, concerning the rejection of claims of a dealer regarding stock transfer, was dismissed. The turnover claimed as stock transfer to the Delhi Head Office was treated as Central Sales by the assessing authority, a decision upheld by the appellate authority and the Tribunal. The Tribunal&#039;s finding rejecting the stock transfer claim was considered a factual determination based on evidence from a survey conducted at the dealer&#039;s premises, supporting the assessment of Central Sales. The dealer&#039;s reliance on a previous judgment for a different assessment year was deemed insufficient to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s factual finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>