<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 571 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163419</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the remand order in a case involving a challenge to an ex parte assessment by the Commercial Tax Officer. The Court emphasized the need for further factual inquiry to determine liability, supporting the revisionary authority&#039;s decision to remand the case for fresh inquiry. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments, the Court found no error in the remand order, citing the importance of allowing the petitioner to prove the nature of the transaction. The judgment clarified the legal principles governing such cases and directed the assessing officer to complete the proceedings promptly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 14:15:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 571 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163419</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the remand order in a case involving a challenge to an ex parte assessment by the Commercial Tax Officer. The Court emphasized the need for further factual inquiry to determine liability, supporting the revisionary authority&#039;s decision to remand the case for fresh inquiry. Despite the petitioner&#039;s arguments, the Court found no error in the remand order, citing the importance of allowing the petitioner to prove the nature of the transaction. The judgment clarified the legal principles governing such cases and directed the assessing officer to complete the proceedings promptly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>