<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 553 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163414</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the stock transfers of kattha and cutch from Bareilly to Calcutta constituted inter-State sales, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It found errors in the Tribunal&#039;s distinction between cutch and kattha transactions, the treatment of kattha as a stock transfer, and the application of an irrelevant amendment in Section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court determined that the transactions met the criteria for inter-State trade, allowing all revisions and setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:55:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 553 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163414</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the stock transfers of kattha and cutch from Bareilly to Calcutta constituted inter-State sales, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision. It found errors in the Tribunal&#039;s distinction between cutch and kattha transactions, the treatment of kattha as a stock transfer, and the application of an irrelevant amendment in Section 9 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The Court determined that the transactions met the criteria for inter-State trade, allowing all revisions and setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>