<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 617 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163404</link>
    <description>A sales tax exemption notification for new industrial units treated &quot;effective steps&quot; as a composite test requiring cumulative compliance with the prescribed pre-cut-off conditions. For a small-scale unit, provisional registration before the cut-off date, fulfilment of the land requirement, and the relevant financial arrangement had to be read together; the word &quot;or&quot; applied only to the alternative financing routes, not to the foundational eligibility conditions. On that construction, later satisfaction of one element could not substitute for missing mandatory steps, and a unit without provisional registration before the cut-off date would not qualify for the exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:09:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 617 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163404</link>
      <description>A sales tax exemption notification for new industrial units treated &quot;effective steps&quot; as a composite test requiring cumulative compliance with the prescribed pre-cut-off conditions. For a small-scale unit, provisional registration before the cut-off date, fulfilment of the land requirement, and the relevant financial arrangement had to be read together; the word &quot;or&quot; applied only to the alternative financing routes, not to the foundational eligibility conditions. On that construction, later satisfaction of one element could not substitute for missing mandatory steps, and a unit without provisional registration before the cut-off date would not qualify for the exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>