<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 69 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245570</link>
    <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, deleting additions related to undisclosed professional receipts and professional indemnity insurance but confirming the reduced disallowance on certain expenses. The ITAT emphasized the importance of relevant documents and upheld the assessee&#039;s contentions where receipts were reconciled and reasonable explanations were provided. However, the disallowance on certain expenses was upheld due to the personal element involved, as confirmed by the CIT(A) and subsequently by the ITAT.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 69 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245570</link>
      <description>The ITAT partly allowed the appeal, deleting additions related to undisclosed professional receipts and professional indemnity insurance but confirming the reduced disallowance on certain expenses. The ITAT emphasized the importance of relevant documents and upheld the assessee&#039;s contentions where receipts were reconciled and reasonable explanations were provided. However, the disallowance on certain expenses was upheld due to the personal element involved, as confirmed by the CIT(A) and subsequently by the ITAT.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>