<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 66 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245567</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of labor charges, directing a 10% disallowance of cash components amounting to Rs.29.5 lakhs. The appeals concerning the disallowance of service tax payment and the alleged violation of Rule 46A of the IT Rules were dismissed, as the service tax payment was found to be appropriately accounted for and there was insufficient evidence to prove a Rule 46A violation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 66 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245567</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of labor charges, directing a 10% disallowance of cash components amounting to Rs.29.5 lakhs. The appeals concerning the disallowance of service tax payment and the alleged violation of Rule 46A of the IT Rules were dismissed, as the service tax payment was found to be appropriately accounted for and there was insufficient evidence to prove a Rule 46A violation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>