https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163400 A company cannot invoke Article 19 through Article 32, though it may challenge discriminatory State action under Article 14. A statutory electricity rebate granted by notification can be varied or rescinded by a later notification under the governing law and the General Clauses Act, so no vested right to perpetual continuation arises. Promissory estoppel cannot prevent withdrawal of a statutory concession where the enabling framework permits change. A tariff clause requiring payment at rates in force from time to time did not freeze the rebate, and the Court would not interfere with a non-arbitrary State policy or regulator-fixed tariff. en-us Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163400 A company cannot invoke Article 19 through Article 32, though it may challenge discriminatory State action under Article 14. A statutory electricity rebate granted by notification can be varied or rescinded by a later notification under the governing law and the General Clauses Act, so no vested right to perpetual continuation arises. Promissory estoppel cannot prevent withdrawal of a statutory concession where the enabling framework permits change. A tariff clause requiring payment at rates in force from time to time did not freeze the rebate, and the Court would not interfere with a non-arbitrary State policy or regulator-fixed tariff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163400