<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 629 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163393</link>
    <description>A recurring question of statutory interpretation was treated as a pure question of law affecting a large number of cases, because it concerned the statutory definition in both its unamended and amended forms. The Tribunal had refused a reference on the basis that the jurisdictional High Court had already addressed the issue, but the court considered it appropriate to revisit the question comprehensively in light of subsequent amendments. The Tribunal was therefore required to make a reference so the issue could be examined on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 18:15:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 629 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163393</link>
      <description>A recurring question of statutory interpretation was treated as a pure question of law affecting a large number of cases, because it concerned the statutory definition in both its unamended and amended forms. The Tribunal had refused a reference on the basis that the jurisdictional High Court had already addressed the issue, but the court considered it appropriate to revisit the question comprehensively in light of subsequent amendments. The Tribunal was therefore required to make a reference so the issue could be examined on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>