<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 641 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163379</link>
    <description>A statutory pre-deposit requirement for first and second appeals under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax amendment was upheld as a valid regulatory condition on the right of appeal. The Court held that the Legislature may impose conditions on a statutory appeal, and the requirement was not so onerous as to make the appellate remedy illusory or an unconstitutional restraint on trade. It further held that regulating the maintainability of an appeal does not interfere with the appellate authority&#039;s quasi-judicial function. No incidental or ancillary power existed to waive an express statutory condition precedent for entertaining the appeal, so the writ petitions failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:45:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 641 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163379</link>
      <description>A statutory pre-deposit requirement for first and second appeals under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax amendment was upheld as a valid regulatory condition on the right of appeal. The Court held that the Legislature may impose conditions on a statutory appeal, and the requirement was not so onerous as to make the appellate remedy illusory or an unconstitutional restraint on trade. It further held that regulating the maintainability of an appeal does not interfere with the appellate authority&#039;s quasi-judicial function. No incidental or ancillary power existed to waive an express statutory condition precedent for entertaining the appeal, so the writ petitions failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>