<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 650 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163376</link>
    <description>Sales tax exemption under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was treated as a limited concession granted by notification for a fixed period, and not as an enforceable right to demand a further extension. The court noted that the power to issue, vary, or cancel exemption notifications does not oblige the Government to continue the benefit for a particular dealer beyond the notified term. Exemption provisions were construed strictly, so the concession could not be extended merely because the industrial unit had not fully used it within the original period. A later notification for a different class of units did not amount to an individual relaxation, and the refusal to extend the exemption was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 650 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163376</link>
      <description>Sales tax exemption under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act was treated as a limited concession granted by notification for a fixed period, and not as an enforceable right to demand a further extension. The court noted that the power to issue, vary, or cancel exemption notifications does not oblige the Government to continue the benefit for a particular dealer beyond the notified term. Exemption provisions were construed strictly, so the concession could not be extended merely because the industrial unit had not fully used it within the original period. A later notification for a different class of units did not amount to an individual relaxation, and the refusal to extend the exemption was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>