<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 525 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163371</link>
    <description>Sales tax exemption under S.R.O. No. 790/1990 was interpreted as turning on the notification&#039;s own text and the Industrial Policy Resolution, not on any implied domestic-sales condition. The benefit could not be denied merely because the manufactured goods were exported, since no such restriction was written into the scheme. On eligibility, the certificate had to reflect installed capacity determined through the prescribed capacity-assessment process; a stated figure unsupported by proper assessment was insufficient. A fresh capacity assessment was therefore required before the eligibility certificate could be validly issued, and the connected tax proceedings were to follow that determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:24:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 525 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163371</link>
      <description>Sales tax exemption under S.R.O. No. 790/1990 was interpreted as turning on the notification&#039;s own text and the Industrial Policy Resolution, not on any implied domestic-sales condition. The benefit could not be denied merely because the manufactured goods were exported, since no such restriction was written into the scheme. On eligibility, the certificate had to reflect installed capacity determined through the prescribed capacity-assessment process; a stated figure unsupported by proper assessment was insufficient. A fresh capacity assessment was therefore required before the eligibility certificate could be validly issued, and the connected tax proceedings were to follow that determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>