<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 556 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163361</link>
    <description>Interest under section 8(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act was leviable where the dealer&#039;s claim that turnover represented a sale in the course of export failed. A sale qualifies as export only if there is a direct and inextricable nexus with the actual export, supported by material such as an export order and matching shipping documents; mere supply to an export-oriented unit is insufficient. Once the exemption claim failed, the turnover remained tax admittedly payable, and the dealer&#039;s plea of bona fide dispute did not defeat interest liability. The appellate deletion of interest was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 13:13:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 556 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163361</link>
      <description>Interest under section 8(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act was leviable where the dealer&#039;s claim that turnover represented a sale in the course of export failed. A sale qualifies as export only if there is a direct and inextricable nexus with the actual export, supported by material such as an export order and matching shipping documents; mere supply to an export-oriented unit is insufficient. Once the exemption claim failed, the turnover remained tax admittedly payable, and the dealer&#039;s plea of bona fide dispute did not defeat interest liability. The appellate deletion of interest was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>