<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163355</link>
    <description>Statutory notice and repeated hearing opportunities were held sufficient where the assessee did not appear personally or through a representative, so the natural justice challenge to the revisional order failed. The court also treated the direction to furnish additional security as a valid revenue-protective measure under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the Rules, because substantial tax arrears and default were found. Financial difficulty and pendency of proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 did not, by themselves, override the obligation to secure collected tax or invalidate the measure. The revised security requirement was therefore upheld and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 581 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163355</link>
      <description>Statutory notice and repeated hearing opportunities were held sufficient where the assessee did not appear personally or through a representative, so the natural justice challenge to the revisional order failed. The court also treated the direction to furnish additional security as a valid revenue-protective measure under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and the Rules, because substantial tax arrears and default were found. Financial difficulty and pendency of proceedings under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 did not, by themselves, override the obligation to secure collected tax or invalidate the measure. The revised security requirement was therefore upheld and the writ petition dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163355</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>