https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245547 The appellate authority upheld the confirmation of demand of duty and penalty imposed on the appellant for clandestine removal of goods. The decision was based on evidence including the clearance of goods without duty payment, the Managing Director's admission, and recovery of credit notes showing excisable goods cleared without proper documentation. Despite the appellant's request for a formal inquiry report not being granted, the court found sufficient evidence to support the allegations. The demand of Rs.70,435 was confirmed, and the appeal was rejected, affirming the impugned orders. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2014 07:59:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245547 The appellate authority upheld the confirmation of demand of duty and penalty imposed on the appellant for clandestine removal of goods. The decision was based on evidence including the clearance of goods without duty payment, the Managing Director's admission, and recovery of credit notes showing excisable goods cleared without proper documentation. Despite the appellant's request for a formal inquiry report not being granted, the court found sufficient evidence to support the allegations. The demand of Rs.70,435 was confirmed, and the appeal was rejected, affirming the impugned orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245547