<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 23 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessees&#039; appeals, permitting them to claim the indexed cost of acquisition from 1986 onwards instead of 2003 as determined by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that the assessees&#039; rights to specific flats had accrued in 1986 itself, not in 2003. It was clarified that the modification agreement altered only the allocation of floors, not the assessees&#039; rights, affirming their entitlement to the earlier year for calculating capital gains. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 due to an incorrect determination of the year of acquisition for one of the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350603" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 23 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessees&#039; appeals, permitting them to claim the indexed cost of acquisition from 1986 onwards instead of 2003 as determined by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that the assessees&#039; rights to specific flats had accrued in 1986 itself, not in 2003. It was clarified that the modification agreement altered only the allocation of floors, not the assessees&#039; rights, affirming their entitlement to the earlier year for calculating capital gains. Additionally, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 due to an incorrect determination of the year of acquisition for one of the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>