<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 5 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245506</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order upholding the demand of duty but setting aside the penalty under Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 was dismissed. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proving the legitimate use of items claimed as capital goods to avoid penalties under the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 5 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245506</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue challenging the order upholding the demand of duty but setting aside the penalty under Rule 15 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 was dismissed. The judgment emphasized the necessity of proving the legitimate use of items claimed as capital goods to avoid penalties under the Cenvat Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245506</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>