<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (5) TMI 467 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the tax liability on services rendered by the appellants before June 1, 2007, under the category of &quot;site formation and clearance, excavation and earthmoving and demolition services.&quot; The interest liability was upheld due to non-disputed tax liability, but the penalty was waived under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the disputed nature of the service. The Tribunal remanded the matter for rectifying a clerical error in calculating the tax liability, ultimately partly allowing the appeal by confirming the tax and interest demand while setting aside the penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 18:20:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (5) TMI 467 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the tax liability on services rendered by the appellants before June 1, 2007, under the category of &quot;site formation and clearance, excavation and earthmoving and demolition services.&quot; The interest liability was upheld due to non-disputed tax liability, but the penalty was waived under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the disputed nature of the service. The Tribunal remanded the matter for rectifying a clerical error in calculating the tax liability, ultimately partly allowing the appeal by confirming the tax and interest demand while setting aside the penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>