<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 487 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163338</link>
    <description>A penalty proceeding under section 20A of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 may be initiated as a separate proceeding even after assessment is completed, and Rule 55C does not require the notice to be issued only while assessment is pending. The jurisdictional basis, however, is a genuine satisfaction reached in the course of a proceeding under the Act that the dealer concealed sales or furnished incorrect particulars with intent to reduce tax. On the facts, the authority acted mechanically from a recital in the assessment order without independent application of mind to the revised return and excess tax payment, so the penalty proceeding and order were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:25:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 487 - WEST BENGAL TAXATION TRIBUNAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163338</link>
      <description>A penalty proceeding under section 20A of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 may be initiated as a separate proceeding even after assessment is completed, and Rule 55C does not require the notice to be issued only while assessment is pending. The jurisdictional basis, however, is a genuine satisfaction reached in the course of a proceeding under the Act that the dealer concealed sales or furnished incorrect particulars with intent to reduce tax. On the facts, the authority acted mechanically from a recital in the assessment order without independent application of mind to the revised return and excess tax payment, so the penalty proceeding and order were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>