<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 705 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163331</link>
    <description>Assessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 must follow the statute and cannot be controlled by an internal circular, but a traders&#039; association lacking a direct cause of action cannot invoke writ jurisdiction merely to challenge such departmental correspondence. The statutory scheme contemplated prior notice of the proposed assessment and an opportunity to object, so any grievance against an assessment alleged to be contrary to law could be pursued before the appropriate authority. On that basis, the writ petition challenging the circular and proposed assessment was held not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 705 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163331</link>
      <description>Assessment under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 must follow the statute and cannot be controlled by an internal circular, but a traders&#039; association lacking a direct cause of action cannot invoke writ jurisdiction merely to challenge such departmental correspondence. The statutory scheme contemplated prior notice of the proposed assessment and an opportunity to object, so any grievance against an assessment alleged to be contrary to law could be pursued before the appropriate authority. On that basis, the writ petition challenging the circular and proposed assessment was held not maintainable and was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>