<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 683 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163293</link>
    <description>An optional fiscal settlement scheme that permits an assessee to resolve pending tax disputes on agreed terms is valid even though it denies refund of excess payment over the amount determined under the scheme. The court reasoned that a person who voluntarily elects to take the benefit of such a concession is bound by its conditions, and that greater legislative latitude applies in fiscal matters. The refund bar was therefore not unconstitutional under Article 14 merely because it may operate harshly in individual cases. Section 6(4) was upheld, the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside, and the Revenue succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 683 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163293</link>
      <description>An optional fiscal settlement scheme that permits an assessee to resolve pending tax disputes on agreed terms is valid even though it denies refund of excess payment over the amount determined under the scheme. The court reasoned that a person who voluntarily elects to take the benefit of such a concession is bound by its conditions, and that greater legislative latitude applies in fiscal matters. The refund bar was therefore not unconstitutional under Article 14 merely because it may operate harshly in individual cases. Section 6(4) was upheld, the Tribunal&#039;s contrary view was set aside, and the Revenue succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>