<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 949 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245501</link>
    <description>Tax dues of a company cannot be enforced against a director&#039;s personal assets unless the statute expressly permits such recovery. Section 38 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 applies only where a limited company is wound up and tax remains unrecovered; in that situation, director liability may arise subject to statutory conditions. As the company was not in liquidation, the provision had no application and the company&#039;s separate juristic personality protected the director from personal recovery. The recovery citation was therefore set aside only to the extent it sought enforcement against the petitioner&#039;s personal assets, while proceedings against the company remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 949 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245501</link>
      <description>Tax dues of a company cannot be enforced against a director&#039;s personal assets unless the statute expressly permits such recovery. Section 38 of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act, 2008 applies only where a limited company is wound up and tax remains unrecovered; in that situation, director liability may arise subject to statutory conditions. As the company was not in liquidation, the provision had no application and the company&#039;s separate juristic personality protected the director from personal recovery. The recovery citation was therefore set aside only to the extent it sought enforcement against the petitioner&#039;s personal assets, while proceedings against the company remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245501</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>