<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 941 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245493</link>
    <description>DEPB sale proceeds were required to be computed for deduction under Section 80HHC in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Topman Exports, including the treatment of receipts linked to Sections 28(iiid) and 28(iv). The governing precedent was applied to the export profit computation, and the assessee&#039;s position on the DEPB issue was accepted. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the tax appeal was rejected on this point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 10:16:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 941 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245493</link>
      <description>DEPB sale proceeds were required to be computed for deduction under Section 80HHC in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling in Topman Exports, including the treatment of receipts linked to Sections 28(iiid) and 28(iv). The governing precedent was applied to the export profit computation, and the assessee&#039;s position on the DEPB issue was accepted. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed, and the tax appeal was rejected on this point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>