<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 912 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow Cenvat credit on inputs for wire drawing activity, citing duty paid on the final product as sufficient compliance despite wire drawing not constituting &quot;manufacture.&quot; The Tribunal referenced a CBEC Circular permitting retroactive credit regularization, aligning with precedents and rejecting Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 912 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to allow Cenvat credit on inputs for wire drawing activity, citing duty paid on the final product as sufficient compliance despite wire drawing not constituting &quot;manufacture.&quot; The Tribunal referenced a CBEC Circular permitting retroactive credit regularization, aligning with precedents and rejecting Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>