<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 910 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245462</link>
    <description>Processed fabrics cleared on a job-work valuation basis were assessed by applying the Ujagar Prints formula, i.e. cost of raw material plus job charges. A binding Board circular stated that traders&#039; profit was not includible in assessable value, and departmental officers were bound to follow it. On the facts, the assessee had already added a further amount in the assessable value, so additional demands for transportation, loading and unloading, and manufacturing expenses were not sustainable. The disputed additions were therefore held to be not includible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 910 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245462</link>
      <description>Processed fabrics cleared on a job-work valuation basis were assessed by applying the Ujagar Prints formula, i.e. cost of raw material plus job charges. A binding Board circular stated that traders&#039; profit was not includible in assessable value, and departmental officers were bound to follow it. On the facts, the assessee had already added a further amount in the assessable value, so additional demands for transportation, loading and unloading, and manufacturing expenses were not sustainable. The disputed additions were therefore held to be not includible, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>