<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 908 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of photographic chemicals, regarding the dispute over Cenvat credit availed on service tax for GTA services. The Tribunal held that the lack of invoices as an input service distributor should not bar the Malanpur unit from taking the credit. Consequently, the requirement of pre-deposit for the appeal, along with the demand, interest, and penalty, was waived, and recovery was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 908 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of photographic chemicals, regarding the dispute over Cenvat credit availed on service tax for GTA services. The Tribunal held that the lack of invoices as an input service distributor should not bar the Malanpur unit from taking the credit. Consequently, the requirement of pre-deposit for the appeal, along with the demand, interest, and penalty, was waived, and recovery was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>