<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty of Rs. 10,000 Upheld Due to Lack of Separate Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case Involving Head Office Invoices.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17941</link>
    <description>CENVAT Credit - invoices are in the name of their head office - even imposition of penalty of Rs.10,000/- is not called for, but in as much as the respondents have not challenged the said order, by way of filing a separate appeal, the same cannot be set aside - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:08:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:08:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty of Rs. 10,000 Upheld Due to Lack of Separate Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case Involving Head Office Invoices.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17941</link>
      <description>CENVAT Credit - invoices are in the name of their head office - even imposition of penalty of Rs.10,000/- is not called for, but in as much as the respondents have not challenged the said order, by way of filing a separate appeal, the same cannot be set aside - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 11:08:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=17941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>