https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245452 A contract to lift and transport iron ore fines through Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary was described as unenforceable because permission for transport had been refused and the area had been declared a Tiger Reserve to be kept inviolate for tiger conservation. On that basis, the contractual object was said to be prohibited by section 38(v) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, making performance unlawful and frustrating the bargain. The note further states that, once the object of the agreement was forbidden by law, a plea that only the buyer was in breach could not succeed, and restitution by refund was justified. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245452 A contract to lift and transport iron ore fines through Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary was described as unenforceable because permission for transport had been refused and the area had been declared a Tiger Reserve to be kept inviolate for tiger conservation. On that basis, the contractual object was said to be prohibited by section 38(v) of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, making performance unlawful and frustrating the bargain. The note further states that, once the object of the agreement was forbidden by law, a plea that only the buyer was in breach could not succeed, and restitution by refund was justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245452