<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 898 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245450</link>
    <description>In computing book profit under section 115JB, the accepted adjustments included the correctly worked out set-off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation on the facts, and only expenditure relatable to income eligible under section 10B could be adjusted under Explanation 1. The assessee&#039;s computation on the second issue was accepted, the Revenue&#039;s objections did not survive, and the relief granted by the first appellate authority was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:37:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 898 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245450</link>
      <description>In computing book profit under section 115JB, the accepted adjustments included the correctly worked out set-off of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation on the facts, and only expenditure relatable to income eligible under section 10B could be adjusted under Explanation 1. The assessee&#039;s computation on the second issue was accepted, the Revenue&#039;s objections did not survive, and the relief granted by the first appellate authority was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>