https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245427 The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 1,03,168 against the appellant for the clearance of Lecithin in June and July 2006, emphasizing that duty liability is determined based on the date of actual removal of goods, not the invoice date. However, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC was set aside as the issue involved a legal interpretation, not malice. The penalty under Rule 25 was also overturned. The appeal was disposed of on 30-5-2012. en-us Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Mar 2014 10:22:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245427 The Tribunal confirmed the duty demand of Rs. 1,03,168 against the appellant for the clearance of Lecithin in June and July 2006, emphasizing that duty liability is determined based on the date of actual removal of goods, not the invoice date. However, the penalty imposed under Section 11AC was set aside as the issue involved a legal interpretation, not malice. The penalty under Rule 25 was also overturned. The appeal was disposed of on 30-5-2012. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245427