<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163283</link>
    <description>Valid cheque tendered to the authorised bank on the due date was treated as payment on that date under the applicable service tax circular, provided the cheque was not dishonoured. Because the circular remained in force during the relevant period, later credit of the amount into the Government account did not make the payment delayed. Interest for delayed payment was therefore not chargeable on the basis of the later clearance date, and the claim for interest was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:23:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=350090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 672 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163283</link>
      <description>Valid cheque tendered to the authorised bank on the due date was treated as payment on that date under the applicable service tax circular, provided the cheque was not dishonoured. Because the circular remained in force during the relevant period, later credit of the amount into the Government account did not make the payment delayed. Interest for delayed payment was therefore not chargeable on the basis of the later clearance date, and the claim for interest was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=163283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>